Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than Galaxy A40, getting a 91.3 score against 79.6. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Galaxy A40 has Android 11, so it provides lots of additional features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy A52 5G body is newer than the Galaxy A40's, although it's a bit thicker and much heavier.
The Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A40 has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A40, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera, a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.