Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 437 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than Galaxy A40's global score of 79.6. Galaxy F62's body is newer, but thicker and a lot heavier than the Galaxy A40. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy F62 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A40, because although it has 4 less processing cores , it also counts with more RAM memory. Galaxy F62 features a superior battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh. Samsung Galaxy F62 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way higher video quality and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.