Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A40, with a 95.4 score against 79.6. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Galaxy A40 has Android 11, providing some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is a lot newer, but heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A40.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a larger screen and a quite greater pixels density.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a way better video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy A40 features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.