Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-10 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Galaxy A40, getting a general score of 88.5 against 79.6. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is much heavier than the Galaxy A40, it's a little thinner and also newer. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Galaxy A40 has Android 11, so it provides some nice extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A40, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a camera with lot less MP and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.