Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-10 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 437 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 has a general score of 79.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's general score of 77.1. The Galaxy A40 construction is a bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a better 2080 x 2400 resolution, a just a little better pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A40 counts with an extremely better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.