Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, with a global score of 82 against 81.7. Although it's the best in this comparison review, iPhone XR is an older, a little thicker and noticeably heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A41. The Apple iPhone XR counts with a faster processor than Galaxy A41, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy A41 and the iPhone XR count with really similar screens, and although the iPhone XR has a little less pixels per display inch and a lot lower 828 x 1792 resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than iPhone XR, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A41 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.