Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the Google Pixel, getting an 81.7 score against 80.2. Galaxy A41's body is way newer and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, although it's just a little heavier. The Galaxy A41 has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A41 also has 4 more cpu cores.
Google Pixel features a display that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy A41, because although the Google Pixel has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. The Galaxy A41 has a superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A41 also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A41 has improved battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.