Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a score of 81.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. Samsung Galaxy A41 is a a little bit heavier device than the Google Pixel 3, but both are equally thin. The Google Pixel 3 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A41. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A41 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.