Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Galaxy A41, getting a global score of 81.9 against 81.7. Although it's the best we compare here, the Google Pixel 4 design is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker than Galaxy A41. Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A41 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.