Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41, with a general score of 82.9 against 81.7. The Google Pixel 4a body is a little thicker but a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A41, and both of them were released only a few months apart. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A41 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A41 has a bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy A41 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.