Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 431 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than the HTC One M9, having a score of 81.7 against 77.7. The Galaxy A41 design is much newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A41 has 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it provides lots of additional features.
HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density. Galaxy A41 features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A41, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor. Galaxy A41 has improved battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Galaxy A41 has a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A41 also has a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger camera aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.