Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Titan gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a bit better than the Galaxy A41, having a score of 85.4 against 81.7. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but LG K92 has 10 version while Galaxy A41 has Android 11. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, LG K92's body is just a little thicker and much heavier than the Galaxy A41.
Galaxy A41 counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen. LG K92 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG K92 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG K92 features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
LG K92 captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also has a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.