Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mirror black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a bit better than the LG Q70, having a global score of 81.7 against 77.9. The Galaxy A41 body is a lot lighter and just a bit thinner than LG Q70, although both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A41 has a more recent 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10.
The LG Q70 features a CPU that's just as good as the Galaxy A41 one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a little bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A41 shoots clearer photographs and videos than LG Q70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a much more MP back facing camera.
The LG Q70 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Q70 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG Q70 counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.