Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A41's 81.7 score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version. LG V30S ThinQ's body is a bit thinner than the Galaxy A41, although it is just a bit heavier and was released 2 years before.
LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little higher display pixels density.
LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy A41 has a little longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.