Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with an 81.7 score against 81.3. The Galaxy A41 body is newer and just a little bit lighter, but just a little thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a bit higher pixel number in each display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy A41, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little better performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy A41 has a bit better battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.