Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy A41 is a bit thicker than the LG V40 ThinQ, it's somewhat lighter and also newer. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A41 has a more recent 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a bit better screen than Galaxy A41, because it has a just a little greater pixels amount per inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V40 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A41 takes better photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rates and a way smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A41 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.