Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A41's overall score of 81.7. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Even being the best we are comparing here, LG V60 ThinQ's construction is thicker and way heavier than Galaxy A41.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A41 has a slightly better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A41 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos in low-light environments, a lot lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with a way lower 48 megapixels resolution.
LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ features a really longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.