Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a bit better than the Galaxy A41, with a global score of 87.1 against 81.7. The LG Velvet is a heavier cellphone than Galaxy A41, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy A41 has a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The LG Velvet has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has more RAM. The LG Velvet counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG Velvet takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a 48 MP resolution and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the LG Velvet also has a larger aperture.
LG Velvet counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 23% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.