Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mineral Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a general score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A41's general score of 81.7. Motorola Edge (2022)'s body is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy A41's, but it's a little bit thicker and heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge (2022) has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, giving a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A41 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A41 features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge (2022) captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a larger camera aperture for better low light images and video, a back camera with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution and higher video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.