Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41's 81.7 score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A41's, although it is extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11, giving you a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A41 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality pictures, a more mega-pixels back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.