Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A41's global score of 81.7. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is a lot newer than Galaxy A41's, but it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a little bit better pixels count per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1256 x 2760 resolution. The Galaxy A41 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back camera with a higher resolution, a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.