Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A41, having an 86.3 score against 81.7. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A41, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version, so it gives you some additional features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a just a little lower screen density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A41 features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a much larger back camera sensor and a more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.