Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power's 76 overall score. The Galaxy A41 construction is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G8 Power, even though both of them were released with only 1 months difference. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A41 has newer 11 version and Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy A41 counts with a little sharper display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Moto G8 Power features a processing unit that's very similar to the Galaxy A41 one, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power and Samsung Galaxy A41 count with incredibly similar storage capacity for apps and games, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Moto G8 Power has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.