Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-15 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 81.7 against 75.8. The Galaxy A41 construction is way newer and a little lighter than Motorola Moto Z Force's, but it is a little bit thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A41 has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a just a little higher screen pixels density. Galaxy A41 features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A41 also has a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Moto Z Force has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force's battery duration is just as good as the Galaxy A41 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.