Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting an 81.7 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A41 body is extremely newer and a little lighter, but just a little thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A41 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Galaxy A41 also has 4 more cpu cores.
Galaxy A41 has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot better resolution back camera. Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A41.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.