Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting an 81.7 score against 77.4. The Galaxy A41 body is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it is extremely thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A41. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A41 has a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit bigger screen and a little bit better screen density. The Moto Z2 Play features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z2 Play also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A41 shoots much better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.