Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a overall score of 81.7 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy A41 construction is newer and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto Z3's, but it's somewhat thicker. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A41 has 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Moto Z3 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A41. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy A41 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a little larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit greater count of pixels in each inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z3 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A41 counts with a little better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also has a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.