Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a score of 81.7 against 79.8. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide identical OS features. Samsung Galaxy A41's design is thinner and extremely lighter than Motorola One Hyper, even though they were only released 5 months apart.
Galaxy A41 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little greater pixels density. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the Galaxy A41 one, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Motorola One Hyper features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.