Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A41, having a general score of 87 against 81.7. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give identical OS features. The Motorola razr (2020) construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A41, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. Motorola razr (2020) features more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same resolution back camera, the same video resolution and the same back camera sensor size, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A41 has better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.