Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a score of 81.7 against 75.8. Although Galaxy A41 and the nubia Red Magic 3S were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy A41 is extremely lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A41 features a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher number of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size and a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations and a lot better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.