Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than Galaxy A41, with a 97.6 score against 81.7. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A41 has Android 11, giving some additional features. Galaxy Fold's construction is a lot heavier but thinner than the Galaxy A41, and both were released with only a couple months difference.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A41 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.