Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-03-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 is slightly better than the Galaxy A41, having a general score of 82.4 against 81.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11, giving some additional features. Despite being the best device in this review, we must highlight that it's also older, just a little bit thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A41 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A41 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with much more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.