Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Galaxy A41, with a 98 score against 81.7. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat thicker and extremely heavier cellphone than Galaxy A41.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A41, because it has a little higher pixel density, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A41, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.