Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is better than Galaxy A41's 81.7 score. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a thinner and noticeably lighter device than the Galaxy A41. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11, giving you a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a little greater pixels density, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A41, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a lot better resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.