Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A41's 81.7 global score. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy S9 is an extremely older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker phone than Galaxy A41. Galaxy S9 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A41. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger camera sensor.
The Galaxy A41 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A41 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A41 features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.