Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 431 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Even when the Galaxy A41 and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 1 months apart, the Galaxy A41 is notably thinner and notably lighter. These devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A41. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's storage to install applications and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A41's one, both have equal internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.