Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Galaxy A41, with a overall score of 88.5 against 81.7. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is heavier but a bit thinner than Galaxy A41, and both were released only a couple months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A41, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A41 has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A41 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.