Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Galaxy A41, with a 92.3 score against 81.7. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Galaxy A41 were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is somewhat heavier but also just a bit thinner than the Galaxy A41. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide the user all the same OS features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A41 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A41 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.