Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black Shadow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.33 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than the Galaxy A41, getting a 91.1 score against 81.7. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has 14 version while Galaxy A41 has Android 11, so it offers some extra features. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's body is notably thinner but much heavier than the Galaxy A41.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a better display than Galaxy A41, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A41 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has superior battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.