Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-15 | 2018-04-20 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, having a general score of 81.7 against 80.4. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version and Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A41 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark.
Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A41, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little less pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A41 has a superior camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.