Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-04-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, having an 81.7 score against 81.4. The Galaxy A41 construction is newer and just a bit lighter, but a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A41 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A41, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit worse number of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A41 has more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and a 48 MP back camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.