Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, getting a global score of 81.7 against 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy A41 is a noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, even though both were only released 8 months apart. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A41 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixel number per inch of screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi 9T features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as Galaxy A41, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T's processor is very similar to the processor in Galaxy A41, both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A41 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.