Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a global score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A41's overall score of 81.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A41 has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A41 features a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A41, because it has a just a little higher pixel density, a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1220 x 2710 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 192 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy A41, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy A41, because it has a much better 200 MP resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.