Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, getting an 81.7 score against 81.1. Galaxy A41 is a thinner and lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A41 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The Galaxy A41 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A41 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro both count with really similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.