Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 266 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A42 is a bit better than Moto G200 5G, having a overall score of 87 against 86.2. Samsung Galaxy A42's construction is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than Moto G200 5G, even though it was released about a year before. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Moto G200 5G features a better display than Galaxy A42, because it has a better pixel number in each inch of screen, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2460 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A42 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A42 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A42, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. Moto G200 5G and Galaxy A42 both have extremely similar batteries performance. The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A42, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.