Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-01-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is better than Galaxy A5 (2016)'s global score of 71.9. The Google Pixel 4 design is much newer, but just a bit thicker and a little heavier than Galaxy A5 (2016). The Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 has a superior CPU than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4 has a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a much better (4K) video definition. Galaxy A5 (2016) counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.