Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), having an 85.4 score against 71.9. Even though the LG K92 is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), it is heavier and somewhat thicker. LG K92 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) counts with a bit better display than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels number per inch in the screen. LG K92 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG K92 features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K92 features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.