Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a overall score of 89.6 against 71.9. Even though the Motorola edge is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), it is notably thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) features a little more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola edge features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola edge features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM.
The Motorola edge takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a much better video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos. Motorola edge has a superior battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.