Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), having a general score of 87.1 against 71.9. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's body is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s, although it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A5 (2016) counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixel density. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much better battery performance than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 72% more battery size. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.