Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)'s 71.9 score. Although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 55% bigger battery size. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.